Anthony Deleon, Sr. v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 354th District Court of Hunt County

Annotate this Case

In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

 

______________________________

 

No. 06-06-00061-CR

______________________________

 

ANTHONY DELEON, SR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

 

On Appeal from the 354th Judicial District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court No. 22,221

 

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Ross

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

Anthony Deleon, Sr., has filed with this Court a motion to extend the time for filing his notice of appeal. According to Deleon's motion, the judgment is dated December 14, 2004.

A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke this Court's jurisdiction. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Rule 26.2(a) prescribes the time period in which a notice of appeal must be filed by a defendant in order to perfect appeal in a criminal case. A defendant's notice of appeal is timely if filed within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, or within ninety days after sentencing if the defendant timely files a motion for new trial. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a); Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522. The motion filed does not refer to a motion for new trial having been filed in this case. The last date Deleon could timely file his notice of appeal was January 13, 2005, thirty days after the day, according to his motion, the sentence was imposed in open court. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). Further, no motion for extension of time was filed in this Court within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal.

Deleon has failed to perfect his appeal. Accordingly, we overrule Deleon's motion for extension of time to file his notice of appeal and dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. //

Donald R. Ross

Justice

 

Date Submitted: April 11, 2006

Date Decided: April 12, 2006

 

Do Not Publish

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.