Sue Fancher v. Citibank (South Dakota) N.A.--Appeal from 6th District Court of Lamar County
Annotate this CaseIn The
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
______________________________
No. 06-05-00063-CV
______________________________
SUE FANCHER, Appellant
V.
CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA) N.A., Appellee
On Appeal from the 6th Judicial District Court
Lamar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 73089
Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Ross
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Sue Fancher, appellant, filed in this Court April 14, 2005, a document titled "Writ to Render Final Judgment Void Request for Remedy Verification and Notice of Service," which we treated as a notice of appeal.
Fancher has not filed a docketing statement with this Court, see Tex. R. App. P. 32, nor has she paid a filing fee or made any claim of indigency. There is nothing in the record to indicate Fancher has made efforts to have either the clerk's record or reporter's record filed with this Court, and she has not filed a brief. On June 3, 2005, we contacted Fancher by letter, giving her an opportunity to cure the various defects, and warning her that, if we did not receive an adequate response within ten days, this appeal would be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).
We have received no communication from Fancher. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.
Donald R. Ross
Justice
Date Submitted: July 5, 2005
Date Decided: July 6, 2005
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.