Sue Fancher v. Citibank (South Dakota) N.A.--Appeal from 6th District Court of Lamar County

Annotate this Case
/**/

In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

 

______________________________

 

No. 06-05-00063-CV

______________________________

 

SUE FANCHER, Appellant

V.

CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA) N.A., Appellee

 

 

On Appeal from the 6th Judicial District Court

Lamar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 73089

 

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Ross

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

Sue Fancher, appellant, filed in this Court April 14, 2005, a document titled "Writ to Render Final Judgment Void Request for Remedy Verification and Notice of Service," which we treated as a notice of appeal.

Fancher has not filed a docketing statement with this Court, see Tex. R. App. P. 32, nor has she paid a filing fee or made any claim of indigency. There is nothing in the record to indicate Fancher has made efforts to have either the clerk's record or reporter's record filed with this Court, and she has not filed a brief. On June 3, 2005, we contacted Fancher by letter, giving her an opportunity to cure the various defects, and warning her that, if we did not receive an adequate response within ten days, this appeal would be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).

We have received no communication from Fancher. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

Donald R. Ross

Justice

 

Date Submitted: July 5, 2005

Date Decided: July 6, 2005

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.