Jerold Gaut v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 71st District Court of Harrison County
Annotate this CaseIn The
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
______________________________
No. 06-05-00045-CR
______________________________
JEROLD GAUT, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 71st Judicial District Court
Harrison County, Texas
Trial Court No. 97-0048X
Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Jerold Gaut appeals from his aggravated sexual assault conviction on his plea of guilty under a plea agreement. The trial court set punishment at twenty-five years' imprisonment, in accordance with the terms of the plea agreement. The trial court filed a certification of Gaut's right of appeal in accordance with Rule 25.2(a)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, stating that this "is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal." See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).
We have jurisdiction to determine whether we have jurisdiction. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Gaut entered into a plea agreement that the trial court did not exceed at sentencing. Under Rule 25.2(a)(2), Gaut was entitled to appeal only "those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial" or "after getting the trial court's permission to appeal." Neither of those conditions appear, and the trial court certified that Gaut has no right of appeal. See Comb v. State, 101 S.W.3d 724, 725 (Tex. App. Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, no pet.).
Because we lack jurisdiction, we dismiss this appeal.
Josh R. Morriss, III
Chief Justice
Date Submitted: February 15, 2005
Date Decided: February 16, 2005
Do Not Publish
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.