Jill Leven, Individually and as Independent Executrix; Neal Leven; Eric Leven; and Jean Marie Leven Holsenbeck v. James Leven, John Leven, Justin Leven, and Leven Cattle Appeal from 100th District Court of Carson County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-23-00316-CV JILL LEVEN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF HENRY PAUL LEVEN; NEAL LEVEN; ERIC LEVEN; AND JEAN MARIE LEVEN HOLSENBECK, APPELLANTS V. JAMES LEVEN, JOHN LEVEN, JUSTIN LEVEN, AND LEVEN CATTLE, APPELLEES On Appeal from the 100th District Court Carson County, Texas Trial Court No. 13,065, Honorable Stuart Messer, Presiding March 25, 2024 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ. Appellants, Jill Leven, Individually and as Independent Executrix of the Estate of Henry Paul Leven; Neal Leven; Eric Leven; and Jean Marie Leven Holsenbeck, appeal from the trial court’s order granting a temporary injunction in favor of Appellees, James Leven, John Leven, Justin Leven, and Leven Cattle. On February 20, 2024, we abated the appeal, pursuant to the parties’ request, to permit proceedings in the trial court to effectuate settlement of the underlying action. On March 14, 2024, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal as moot because the trial court signed an agreed order vacating the temporary injunction which is the basis for this appeal. As no decision of the Court has been delivered to date, we reinstate the appeal and grant the motion. The appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a), 43.2(f). Pursuant to the motion, costs shall be taxed against the parties that incurred them. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d). Per Curiam 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
