In the Interest of M.A.M., a Child Appeal from County Court at Law of Moore County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-19-00173-CV IN THE INTEREST OF M.A.M., A CHILD On Appeal from the County Court at Law Moore County, Texas Trial Court No. CL200-18, Honorable Delwin T. McGee, Presiding July 31, 2019 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and PARKER, JJ. The suit underlying this appeal was initiated by the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services. The latter sought to terminate the parental relationship between M.A.M. and the child’s biological parents, among other things. The trial court eventually issued its order dismissing the Department as the child’s temporary managing conservator and returned the child to the child’s mother. Nothing was said within the order about the cause of action for termination in general. Nor did the order mention appellant, A.M., father of M.A.M. of the termination suit against him. A.M. appealed. Generally, appellate courts only have jurisdiction over final judgments. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). A judgment is final for purposes of appeal if it disposes of all pending parties and claims. Id. We have jurisdiction to consider immediate appeals of interlocutory orders only if a statute explicitly provides appellate jurisdiction. Stary v. DeBord, 967 S.W.2d 352, 352–53 (Tex. 1998). Questioning whether we had jurisdiction over the appeal, we notified A.M. and the Department. of our concern and directed them to explain in writing why jurisdiction exists. They were to file their replies no later than July 26, 2019. To date, neither has replied or otherwise attempted to explain how we have jurisdiction over this appeal, given that the order of dismissal encompassed only one of multiple aspects or causes of action and only one of multiple parties. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. Per Curiam 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
