In the Interest of B.M.A., a Child Appeal from 425th Judicial District Court of Williamson County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo ________________________ No. 07-15-00403-CV ________________________ IN THE INTEREST OF B.M.A., A CHILD On Appeal from the 425th District Court Williamson County, Texas Trial Court No. 14-1261-F425; Honorable Betsy F. Lambeth, Presiding November 20, 2015 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. Appellant, David S. Ambrose, filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s order in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship. By letter dated September 23, 2015, the Clerk of the Third Court of Appeals advised Ambrose that a filing fee of $205 was overdue and directed him to submit payment on or before October 2, 2015.1 By letter dated October 27, 2015, this court also advised Ambrose that the filing fee was overdue, directed him to pay the filing fee, and notified him that failure to submit 1 After the letter was issued, this appeal was transferred from the Third Court of Appeals to this court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West 2013). payment on or before November 9, 2015, would subject the appeal to dismissal pursuant to Rule 42.3(c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. An inquiry from the Clerk of this court to the Clerk of the Third Court of Appeals revealed that Ambrose has not responded, paid the filing fee, nor made other arrangements for the discharge of the filing fee with either this court or the Third Court of Appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 12.1(b). Unless a party is excused from paying a filing fee, the Clerk of this court is required to collect filing fees set by statute or the Texas Supreme Court when an item is presented for filing. See id. at 5, 12.1(b). Although the filing of a proper notice of appeal invokes an appellate court’s jurisdiction, if a party fails to follow the prescribed rules of appellate procedure, the appeal may be dismissed. Id. at 25.1(b). Accordingly, having provided Ambrose a reasonable opportunity to cure this defect, this appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with a directive from this court requiring action within a specified time. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). Per Curiam 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.