Eddie A. Nunnelley, Jr. v. J. Beach Appeal from 108th District Court of Potter County (memorandum opinion by chief justice quinn)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-15-00290-CV EDDIE A. NUNNELLEY, JR., APPELLANT V. J. BEACH, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 108th District Court Potter County, Texas Trial Court No. 104,482-E, Honorable Douglas Woodburn, Presiding August 7, 2015 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. Appellant, Eddie A. Nunnelley, Jr., filed an appeal in the above-referenced cause without paying the requisite filing fee. By letter dated July 23, 2015, this court directed Nunnelley to pay the filing fee or file an affidavit of indigence, and if indigent, he must comply with Chapter 14 by filing 1) an affidavit describing his previous filings and 2) a certified copy of his inmate trust account. He was also told that the appeal would be dismissed if he did not comply. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c); see TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 14.002 (West Supp. 2014) (stating that Chapter 14 applies to appeals brought by an inmate in an appellate court); Douglas v. Moffett, 418 S.W.3d 336 (Tex. App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 2013, no pet.). In his response, Nunnelley filed an affidavit of indigence and a certified copy of his inmate account. However, he failed to file an affidavit describing his previous filings. The requirement to tender an affidavit complying with Chapter 14 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code is mandatory; the failure to do so is grounds for dismissal of the lawsuit. Douglas v. Moffett, 418 S.W.3d at 340; see also In re Anthony G. Hereford, Jr., No. 07-14-00348-CV, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 11521, at *1-2 (Tex. App.— Amarillo October 17, 2014, orig. proceeding) (holding that the failure to comply with Chapter 14 subjected the mandamus proceeding to dismissal). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. Brian Quinn Chief Justice 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.