In re Bryan Keith Price, Relator Appeal from ... of ... County (memorandum opinion )
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo ________________________ No. 07-15-00137-CV ________________________ IN RE BRYAN KEITH PRICE, RELATOR Original Proceeding Arising from the 100th District Court Collingsworth County, Texas Trial Court No. 2880; Honorable Stuart Messer, Presiding April 23, 2015 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. On April 6, 2015, Bryan Keith Price, an inmate proceeding pro se, filed his Original Application for Writ of Mandamus seeking to compel the Honorable Stuart Messer to rule on a motion he filed with the clerk of the 100th District Court, pertaining to his access to a previously furnished reporter’s record. By letter dated April 7, 2015, this Court advised Price that the required filing fee of $145 did not accompany the filing of his application. Said letter directed him to pay the required filing fee or, in lieu thereof, file an affidavit of indigence in compliance with Rule 20.1(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure on or before April 17, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 12.1(b). On April 21, 2015, Price filed with this Court an unsworn declaration of inability to pay costs, entitled Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The declaration and application were accompanied by a statement of his Texas Department of Criminal Justice inmate account showing de minimus assets. Accordingly, the application and statement set forth sufficient information to establish his indigence. However, the letter of April 7 further advised Price that chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code requires that an inmate who files an affidavit or unsworn declaration of inability to pay costs shall also file a separate affidavit or declaration relating to previous filings. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 14.004 (West Supp. 2014). Said letter also directed compliance with this requirement on or before April 17, 2015. To date, Price has not complied with this requirement. Unless a party is excused from paying a filing fee, the Clerk of this Court is required to collect filing fees set by statute or the Supreme Court when an item is presented for filing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 12.1(b). Although the filing of a request for mandamus relief invokes this Court’s jurisdiction, if a party fails to follow the prescribed rules of appellate procedure, the application may be dismissed. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.1. Furthermore, the provisions of chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code apply to original proceedings, such as the mandamus proceeding pending before this Court. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 14.002. See also In re Morris, No. 12-14-00106-CV, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 4634, at *3 (Tex. App.—Tyler April 30, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.); Douglas v. Turner, 441 S.W.3d 337, 338 (Tex. App.— Waco 2013, no pet.) (holding inmate’s failure to file affidavit of previous filings warranted dismissal of appeal). This means that Price’s application for writ of mandamus is 2 subject to dismissal for the failure to comply with a directive from this Court requiring that he comply with section 14.004 within a specified time. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). Because Price has failed to file an appropriate affidavit or declaration relating to previous filings within the time provided by this Court for compliance, his original proceeding is dismissed. Patrick A. Pirtle Justice 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
