In re Luis S. Lagaite, Jr., Relator Appeal from ... of ... County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-15-00101-CV IN RE LUIS S. LAGAITE, JR., RELATOR OPINION ON ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS April 9, 2015 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. Pending before the court is the petition for writ of mandamus filed by Luis S. Lagaite, Jr. He asks us to order Respondent, “William Stephen, in his individual and official capacity as executive director of T.D.C.” to “immediately assigned [sic] relator to a permanent ID. Unit, and the return of all his legal and personal property, so he can perfect an appeal.” We deny the petition. We cannot normally issue a writ of mandamus against anyone other than a judge. TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221 (West 2004). There exists an exception to that limitation, however. It encompasses instances wherein mandamus is necessary to protect our appellate jurisdiction. In re Washington, 7 S.W.3d 181, 182 (Tex. App.— Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, no pet.). But, before it can be said that we are protecting our appellate jurisdiction, there must be an appeal pending wherein the relator is a party. Id. Lagaite’s complaint does not relate to a pending appeal or to our jurisdiction over a pending appeal. Nor has he appended a copy of any judgment susceptible to appeal. More importantly, we read his application as simply his complaint about having a temporary prison assignment and as a means of securing a permanent prison assignment. We have no jurisdiction to require the executive director of the “T.D.C.” to make such an assignment. Accordingly, the petition for mandamus is denied. Per Curiam 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
