Patrick R. Cox v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 200th District Court of Travis County (per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 07-12-00453-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A FEBRUARY 14, 2013 PATRICK R. COX, APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE FROM THE 200TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY; NO. D-1-GV-10-000486; HONORABLE ORLINDA NARANJO, JUDGE Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. ORDER On February 12, 2013, appellant, Patrick R. Cox, filed an Emergency Motion for Enforcement of Supersedeas Pending Hearing on Appellant s Motion for Review of Trial Court s Ruling on Supersedeas, which requests this Court to issue an order staying all collection efforts by the State of Texas pending this Court s ruling on Cox s simultaneously filed Motion for Review of Trial Court s Rulings on Supersedeas and Validity of Appellant s Net Worth Affidavit Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 24.4. After consideration of the emergency motion and the State of Texas s response, the Court is of the opinion that the motion should be denied. Additionally, Cox s Motion for Review of Trial Court s Rulings on Supersedeas and Validity of Appellant s Net Worth Affidavit Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 24.4 is denied. By this motion, Cox implies a ruling of the trial court that has not been made. Because Cox s motion does not challenge the amount of supersedeas bond set by the trial court s November 20, 2012 order but, rather, challenges a ruling on Cox s net worth affidavit that the trial court has not actually rendered, this Court does not have authority to consider the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 24.4(a). Per Curiam 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
