Mario Soccorro Martinez v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 47th District Court of Potter County (per curiam)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 07-12-0242-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A JANUARY 3, 2013 ______________________________ MARIO SOCCORRO MARTINEZ, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE _________________________________ FROM THE 47TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY; NO. 63,883-A; HONORABLE DAN SCHAAP, JUDGE _______________________________ Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. ABATEMENT AND REMAND Following a plea of not guilty, Appellant, Mario Soccorro Martinez, was convicted by a jury of possession of a controlled substance, enhanced, and sentenced to nine years confinement. When the clerk s record was filed, it came to this Court s attention that it did not contain a Trial Court s Certification of Defendant s Right of Appeal as required by Rule 25.2(a)(2) and (d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. By letter dated October 29, 2012, the trial court and trial court clerk were notified of the defect and given thirty days to correct the deficiency. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1. Following expiration of the deadline, on December 20, 2012, the Clerk of this Court inquired of the trial court clerk whether a certification had been filed. The trial court clerk advised that the certification remained outstanding. Consequently, we now abate this appeal and remand this cause to the trial court for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means necessary to secure a proper Trial Court's Certification of Defendant's Right of Appeal in compliance with Rule 25.2(d). Once properly completed and executed, the certification shall be filed and included in a supplemental clerk's record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(a)(12). The trial court shall cause the supplemental clerk's record to be filed with the Clerk of this Court within 30 days of the date of this order. If a supplemental clerk's record containing a proper certification is not filed in accordance with this order, this cause will be referred to this Court for further action. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). It is so ordered. Per Curiam Do not publish. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.