Charles Ray Martin, Principal and Davie C. Westmoreland dba Westmoreland Bail Bonds, Surety v. State of Texas--Appeal from County Court at Law No 1 of Randall County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 07-09-0161-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C SEPTEMBER 17, 2009 ______________________________ CHARLES RAY MARTIN, PRINCIPAL, DAVIE C. WESTMORELAND, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A WESTMORELAND BAIL BONDS, SURETY, APPELLANTS V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE _________________________________ FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF RANDALL COUNTY; NO. 2008-109-CV; HONORABLE JAMES ANDERSON, JUDGE _______________________________ Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Davie C. Westmoreland, issued a bond to secure the appearance of Charles Ray Martin in a criminal proceeding. When Martin failed to appear, the State sought forfeiture of the bond and obtained a judgment nisi. After no answer was filed, the trial court rendered a default judgment that the State of Texas recover $3,000. Westmoreland filed a Notice of Restricted Appeal challenging the judgment. Presenting a sole issue, Westmoreland maintains the trial court erred in rendering a default judgment due to fatally defective service of process. By letter brief, the State of Texas indicates it does not oppose the relief sought by Westmoreland. Accordingly, as requested by Westmoreland, we reverse the default judgment rendered on February 18, 2009, and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings. Pursuant to Rule 43.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, costs are taxed against the State of Texas. Under the facts presented, our mandate will issue forthwith. Patrick A. Pirtle Justice 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
