Certain Primary Underwriters at Lloyd's, London of M.E.C. &/or Mobile Express Corporation and Certain Excess Underwriters at Lloyd's, London M.E.C. &/or Mobile Express Corporation v. Herring Bank f/k/a Herring National Bank--Appeal from 181st District Court of Potter County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 07-08-0490-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL B APRIL 29, 2009 ______________________________ CERTAIN PRIMARY UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD S, LONDON OF M.E.C. &/OR MOBILE EXPRESS CORPORATION AND CERTAIN EXCESS UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD S, LONDON OF M.E.C. &/OR MOBILE EXPRESS CORPORATION , APPELLANTS V. HERRING BANK F/K/A HERRING NATIONAL BANK, APPELLEE _________________________________ FROM THE 181ST DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY; NO. 93,282-B; HONORABLE JOHN B. BOARD, JUDGE _______________________________ Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. ON MOTION TO DISMISS On April 27, 2009, appellants Certain Primary Underwriters at Lloyd s, London of M.E.C. &/or Mobile Express Corporation and Certain Excess Underwriters at Lloyd s, London of M.E.C. &/or Mobile Express Corporation filed a motion to dismiss their appeal. According to the motion, the parties reached a settlement. In the motion, counsel for appellants states that he conferred with counsel for appellee and counsel for appellee does not oppose the motion. Appellants further request taxation of appellate costs against them. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Costs of the appeal are taxed against appellants. Having dismissed the appeal at appellants request, we will not entertain a motion for rehearing and our mandate will issue forthwith. James T. Campbell Justice 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
