Koree Dawn Edwards v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 47th District Court of Potter County

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NO. 07-07-0423-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL D OCTOBER 23, 2007 ______________________________ KOREE DAWN EDWARDS, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE _________________________________ FROM THE 47TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY; NO. 54,653-A; HONORABLE HAL MINER, JUDGE _______________________________ Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Koree Dawn Edwards, filed a notice of appeal challenging her conviction and sentence. Sentence was imposed in open court on June 19, 2007, and a Motion for New Trial was filed on July 6, 2007. We dismiss for want of jurisdiction. In a criminal case where a motion for new trial is filed, the notice of appeal must be filed within 90 days after the date sentence is imposed. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(2). The time within which to file the notice may be enlarged if, within 15 days after the deadline for filing the notice, the party files the notice of appeal and a motion complying with Rule 10.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. Appellant s notice of appeal was due to be filed on September 19, 2007, but was not filed with the trial court clerk until October 12, 2007, well outside the fifteen-day extension period. Appellant s appointed counsel explained by letter that the untimely notice of appeal was due to his error. Attached to the letter is a copy of Appellant s Pauper s Oath on Appeal and Order Appointing Counsel signed by her on June 19, 2007. Counsel requests that the untimely notice relate back to that document as Appellant s declaration of intent to appeal. A notice of appeal which complies with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure is essential to vest this Court with jurisdiction. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 209-10 (Tex.Crim.App. 1998). If an appeal is not timely perfected, this Court does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal, and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Id. at 210. Rule 2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides that an appellate court may - to expedite a decision or for other good cause - suspend a rule s operation in a particular case and order a different procedure. However, this rule cannot be invoked to 2 create jurisdiction where none exists. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996)(noting that Rule 2(b)[current Rule 2] or Rule 83 [current rule 44.3] could not be invoked to create jurisdiction where none exists). This Court has no authority to accept a signed Pauper s Oath on Appeal in lieu of a timely notice of appeal. To do so would obviate Rule 25.2(b) which requires the timely filing of a sufficient notice of appeal. See also Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(c) (form and sufficiency of notice). We acknowledge that Appellant may be entitled to an out-of-time appeal by filing a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals; however, the availability of that remedy is also beyond the jurisdiction of this Court. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07, § 3(a) (Vernon 2005). See also Ex parte Garcia, 988 S.W.2d 240 (Tex.Crim.App. 1999). Consequently, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. Patrick A. Pirtle Justice Do not publish. 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.