Kandy Lynn Antrikin v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 251st District Court of Randall County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 07-07-0324-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL B SEPTEMBER 28, 2007 ______________________________ KANDY LYNN ANTRIKIN, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE _________________________________ FROM THE 251ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY; NO. 16518-C; HONORABLE ANA ESTEVEZ, JUDGE _______________________________ Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Kandy Lynn Antrikin, appeals from an adjudication of her guilt for the offense of possession and transport of certain chemicals with intent to manufacture a controlled substance. No certification of defendant s right to appeal has been executed by the trial court regarding the adjudication.1 By letter dated July 25, 2007, this court notified 1 A certification of defendant s right of appeal indicating that appellant had no right to appeal and had waived the same is included in the clerk s record. However, by the date upon which this certification was signed, it could only apply to the order placing appellant on deferred adjudication probation and not to the adjudication proceeding. See TEX . R. APP. P. 25.2 cmt. (Trial court shall certify defendant s right of appeal in every case in which judgment or other appealable order is entered). appellant, her appellate counsel, and the trial court that no certification of defendant s right of appeal had been filed. Further, this letter indicated that if certification was not filed within 30 days of the letter, this court may dismiss the appeal. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) requires dismissal of an appeal from a criminal conviction in the absence of a certification showing the defendant s right of appeal. As this court has not received such a certification, we dismiss the appeal. Mackey K. Hancock Justice Do not publish. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
