Christopher Zeiss v. Citibank (South Dakota) N.A.--Appeal from County Court at Law No 3 of Lubbock County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 07-07-0015-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL C MARCH 29, 2007 ______________________________ CHRISTOPHER ZEISS, APPELLANT V. CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA) N.A., APPELLEE _________________________________ FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF LUBBOCK COUNTY; NO. 2005-597553; HONORABLE PAULA LANEHART, JUDGE _______________________________ Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Christopher Zeiss, perfected an appeal from the trial court s order granting Citibank s Motion for Summary Judgment. The parties have filed a Joint Motion to Dismiss Appeal asserting that the parties have reached a settlement agreement. The joint motion requests that this court vacate the trial court s judgment without regard to the merits and dismiss the appeal. This disposition is authorized by rules 42.1(a)(2)(A) and 43.2(e) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Finding the motion complies with the requirements of rules 6.6 and 42.1(a), we vacate the judgment of the trial court and dismiss the appeal in conformity with the parties agreement. Having disposed of this appeal at the parties request, we will not entertain a motion for rehearing and our mandate shall issue forthwith. Per Curiam 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
