Robert W. Paige, M.D. v. Sprouse, Smith & Rowley, P.C. f/k/a Sprouse, Mozola, Smith & Rowley, P.C. and John Mozola--Appeal from 108th District Court of Potter County

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NO. 07-03-0319-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL E APRIL 14, 2005 ______________________________ ROBERT W. PAIGE, M.D., Appellant v. SPROUSE, SMITH & ROWLEY, P.C. F/K/A SPROUSE, MOZOLA, SMITH & ROWLEY, P.C. AND JOHN MOZOLA, Appellees _________________________________ FROM THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY; NO. 88,858-E; HON. ABE LOPEZ, PRESIDING _______________________________ ON MOTION TO DISMISS _______________________________ Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ., and BOYD, S.J.1 Kent Ries, trustee for the bankruptcy estate of appellant Robert W. Paige, M.D., and Sprouse, Smith & Rowley, P.C., f/k/a Sprouse, Mozola, Smith & Rowley, P.C., and John Mozola, appellees, by and through their attorneys, have filed a motion to dismiss this 1 John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment. Tex. Gov t Code Ann. §75.002(a)(1) (Vernon Supp. 2004-2005). appeal with prejudice because the parties have fully compromised and settled all issues in dispute and neither desire to pursue the appeal. Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at the parties request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith. Brian Quinn Justice 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.