Pete Henry Clements v. The State of Texas--Appeal from Criminal District Court of Jefferson County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 07-02-0412-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL E
JUNE 11, 2003
______________________________
PETE HENRY CLEMENTS,
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee
_________________________________
FROM THE CRIMINAL JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY;
NO. 82781; HON. CHARLES D. CARVER, PRESIDING
_______________________________
Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ., and BOYD, S.J.1
Pete Henry Clements (appellant) appeals from a judgment adjudicating him guilty
of failing to comply with the registration requirements applicable to sex offenders. We
affirm.
Pursuant to a plea bargain, appellant entered a plea of guilty to the above
referenced charge, and the trial court assessed punishment at four years in prison.
Appellant timely noticed his appeal, and counsel was appointed. The latter moved to
1
John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment. Tex. Gov’t
Code Ann. §75.002(a)(1) (Vernon Supp. 2003).
withdraw after filing a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396,
18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and representing that he had searched the record and found no
arguable grounds for reversal. The motion and brief illustrated that appellant was informed
of his rights to review the appellate record and file his own brief. So too did we inform
appellant that any brief he cared to file had to be filed by June 9, 2003. To date, appellant
has filed no brief.
After conducting an independent review of the record, we find no reversible error.
Appellant represented to the court via the plea admonishment papers he signed that he
was 1) properly indicted, 2) represented by legal counsel, and 3) mentally competent when
he entered his plea. Furthermore, the punishment levied was within the range provided
by statute.
Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is granted, and the judgment of the trial
court is affirmed.
Brian Quinn
Justice
Do not publish.
2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
