Sandra E. Parker v. Robert J. Glasgow, Jr.; and Glasgow, Taylor, Isham & Glasgow, P.C. Appeal from 355th District Court of Hood County (concurring memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-15-00378-CV SANDRA E. PARKER APPELLANT V. ROBERT J. GLASGOW, JR.; AND GLASGOW, TAYLOR, ISHAM & GLASGOW, P.C. APPELLEES ---------FROM THE 355TH DISTRICT COURT OF HOOD COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. C2014011 ---------- CONCURRING MEMORANDUM OPINION1 ---------I concur. I write separately to emphasize that my concurrence with the majority’s disposition sustaining Appellant Sandra E. Parker’s first and second issues is based solely on the fact that the motion for summary judgment filed by Appellees Robert J. Glasgow, Jr. and Glasgow, Taylor, Isham & Glasgow, P.C. 1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. on Parker’s legal malpractice claim filed against them was a traditional motion for summary judgment seeking judgment as a matter of law. The majority’s holding does not preclude the filing of a no-evidence motion for summary judgment by Appellees. With this caveat, I respectfully concur. /s/ Sue Walker SUE WALKER JUSTICE DELIVERED: June 22, 2017 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
