Sheila Wilson v. Tarrant County Constables, its Agents, Assigns and/or Successors in Interest, its Affiants, U. S. Persons of interest (person, firms, corporations and political entities,) and Federal National Mortgage Association, its Agents, et al.Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 of Tarrant County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-13-00382-CV SHEILA WILSON APPELLANT V. TARRANT COUNTY CONSTABLES, ITS AGENTS, ASSIGNS AND/OR SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST, ITS AFFIANTS, U.S. PERSONS OF INTEREST (PERSON, FIRMS, CORPORATIONS AND POLITICAL ENTITIES), AND FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, ITS AGENTS AND/OR SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST, AND ITS AFFIANTS APPELLEES ---------FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY ---------- MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 ---------Sheila Wilson appeals from a September 9, 2013 order dismissing her suit. Although her notice of appeal was due October 9, 2013, she did not mail it for filing until October 25, 2013; therefore, her notice of appeal was untimely. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b), 26.1(a)(1), 26.3. On October 28, 2013, we sent appellant a letter indicating our concern that we do not have jurisdiction over the appeal because the notice of appeal is untimely and stating that unless she filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal, the appeal could be dismissed. Although appellant filed a response, it does not show grounds for continuing the appeal. Because appellant s notice of appeal is untimely, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(a), 26.1(a)(1), 42.3(a), 43.2(f); Crites v. Collins, 284 S.W.3d 839, 840 (Tex. 2009) (indicating that jurisdiction vests with a timely-filed notice of appeal); Howlett v. Tarrant Cnty., 301 S.W.3d 840, 843 (Tex. App. Fort Worth 2009, pet. denied) (op. on reh g) ( A timely-filed notice of appeal confers jurisdiction on this court, and absent a timely[-]filed 1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. 2 notice of appeal, we must dismiss the appeal. ). PER CURIAM PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ. DELIVERED: December 12, 2013 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
