Howard Rosenstein v. Beth Poulos--Appeal from 231st District Court of Tarrant County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-09-223-CV HOWARD ROSENSTEIN APPELLANT V. BETH POULOS APPELLEE ---------- FROM THE 231ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY ------------ MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 AND JUDGMENT ---------On August 11, 2009, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal had informed this court that arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk s record as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2). We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant, within fifteen days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk s record 1 ¦ See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. and provided this court with proof of payment. Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk s record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), 43.2(f). Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue. PER CURIAM PANEL: MCCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and MEIER, J. DELIVERED: September 10, 2009 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
