Elizabeth Anne Rohr v. The State of Texas--Appeal from County Criminal Court No. 3 of Denton County

Annotate this Case

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-07-126-CR

ELIZABETH ANNE ROHR APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 3 OF DENTON COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]

------------

 

On March 13, 2007, appellant Elizabeth Anne Rohr filed a notice of appeal from the trial court=s denial of her motion for judgment nunc pro tunc. On April 12, 2007, we informed appellant by letter of our concern that we do not have jurisdiction over such an appeal;[2] we also told appellant that the appeal could be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless she or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal on or before April 23, 2007. We have not received any response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.[3]

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); Sanchez, 112 S.W.3d at 312; Everett, 82 S.W.3d at 735.

PER CURIAM

PANEL D: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P.47.2(b)

DELIVERED: June 7, 2007

 

[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

[2]See Sanchez v. State, 112 S.W.3d 311, 312 (Tex. App.CCorpus Christi 2003, no pet.) (holding that court of appeals does not have jurisdiction over appeal from order denying a request for judgment nunc pro tunc to correct jail time credit); Everett v. State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.CWaco 2002, pet. dism=d) (holding same); see also Moffatt v. State, No. 02-05-00372-CR, 2005 WL 3082253, at *1 (Tex. App.CFort Worth Nov. 17, 2005, no pet.) (mem. op.) (not designated for publication) (citing above cases and holding same).

[3]To the extent that appellant=s ANotice & Application for Writ Ordering Law Library Access or Appeal Bond for >Pro Se= Prisoner Held in Denton Co Jail@ seeks relief with respect to this appeal, such relief is DENIED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.