Thomas Harris and All Other Occupants v. Kathy Griffith--Appeal from County Court at Law of Wise County

Annotate this Case

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-05-286-CV

THOMAS HARRIS AND APPELLANTS

ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS

V.

KATHY GRIFFITH APPELLEE

----------

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF WISE COUNTY

----------

    MEMORANDUM  OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

----------

 

On November 17, 2005, we notified Appellants that their brief had not been filed as required by TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a) and stated that the appeal was subject to dismissal unless Appellants or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a motion reasonably explaining the failure to file a brief and the need for an extension. Thereafter, we granted three extensions in response to motions for extension filed by Vicki King, pro se. On February 28, 2006, we ordered that Appellants= brief was due on April 14, 2006, and stated that no further extensions would be granted. We have not received Appellants= brief.

Because Appellants have not filed a brief, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

PANEL D: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DELIVERED: May 11, 2006

 

[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.