Yusof A. Shabazz v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 371st District Court of Tarrant County

Annotate this Case
/**/

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH

NO. 2-04-155-CR

 

YUSOF A. SHABAZZ APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

 

------------

FROM THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

In a single point on appeal, appellant contends that the evidence is legally insufficient to support the trial court s deadly weapon finding. Appellant pled guilty and signed a judicial confession stating that he had committed each and every allegation [the indictment] contains, which alleged that appellant used or exhibited a deadly weapon in committing the offense. At the plea hearing, appellant answered True when asked whether he used or exhibited a deadly weapon. We hold that this evidence is sufficient to support the deadly weapon finding. See Keller v. State, 125 S.W.3d 600, 605 (Tex. App. Houston [1st Dist.] 2003), pet. dism d, improvidently granted, 146 S.W.3d 677 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004), cert. denied, 125 S. Ct. 1603 (2005); Hunt v. State, 967 S.W.2d 917, 919 (Tex. App. Beaumont 1998, no pet.); Rankin v. State, No. 02-98-00382-CR, slip op. at 5 (Tex. App. Fort Worth Mar. 7, 2002, pet. ref d) (op. on remand) (not designated for publication). We overrule appellant s sole point and affirm the trial court s judgment.

PER CURIAM

 

PANEL F: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: June 9, 2005

NOTES

1. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.