In Re Commitment of James GrinsteadAppeal from 435th District Court of Montgomery County (memorandum opinion )
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-12-00450-CV ____________________ IN RE COMMITMENT OF JAMES GRINSTEAD _______________________________________________________ ______________ On Appeal from the 435th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 07-02-02125-CV ________________________________________________________ _____________ MEMORANDUM OPINION James Grinstead filed a notice of appeal from an interlocutory order modifying residency requirements of his civil commitment order. We conclude the interlocutory order is not appealable and that mandamus relief is not warranted. This Court has no appellate jurisdiction over the interlocutory order. See In re Commitment of Cortez, No. 09-12-00385-CV, 2013 WL 3270613 (Tex. App. Beaumont June 27, 2013, no pet. h.). We have reviewed the merits of the issues to determine whether mandamus relief is appropriate. We considered these same arguments and issues in Cortez and rejected them. See id. For the reasons 1 explained in Cortez, we conclude mandamus relief is not appropriate. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. APPEAL DISMISSED. ________________________________ DAVID GAULTNEY Justice Submitted on July 10, 2013 Opinion Delivered July 25, 2013 Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger, JJ. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
