Jasmine Shanice Johnson v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 252nd District Court of Jefferson County (majority)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-11-00264-CR ____________________ JASMINE SHANICE JOHNSON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee _____________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 252nd District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 08-04156 _____________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Pursuant to a plea agreement, Jasmine Shanice Johnson pleaded guilty to the offense of endangering a child. The trial court deferred adjudication of guilt and placed Johnson on unadjudicated community supervision for five years. The State filed a motion to revoke the community supervision. Johnson pleaded true to two violations of the community supervision order. The trial court found Johnson violated the terms of the community supervision order, adjudicated her guilt, and sentenced her to two years in state jail. 1 Johnson s appellate counsel filed an Anders brief in which he concluded there are no arguable grounds of error. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). Johnson was advised of her right to file a pro se response. She did not file a response. We have independently reviewed the record to determine whether there are any arguable grounds that support an appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 509-10 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We have found none. It is unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to rebrief Johnson s appeal. See Bledsoe, 178 S.W.3d at 826-27; compare Stafford, 813 S.W.2d at 511. The trial court s judgment is affirmed. AFFIRMED. ________________________________ DAVID GAULTNEY Justice Submitted on November 7, 2011 Opinion Delivered November 30, 2011 Do Not Publish Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger, JJ. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.