Reginald Dewayne Chambers v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 252nd District Court of Jefferson County (majority)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-11-00198-CR ____________________ REGINALD DEWAYNE CHAMBERS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee _____________________________________________________________ ________ On Appeal from the 252nd District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 06-99078 __________________________________________________________________ ___ MEMORANDUM OPINION Reginald Dewayne Chambers pleaded guilty to unauthorized use of a vehicle. The trial court deferred adjudication of guilt and placed Chambers on unadjudicated community supervision for five years. The State filed a motion to revoke the community supervision. Chambers pleaded true to four violations of the community supervision order. The trial court found Chambers violated the terms of the community supervision order, adjudicated his guilt, and sentenced him to two years in state jail. 1 Chambers s appellate counsel filed an Anders brief in which he concluded there are no arguable grounds of error. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). Chambers was advised of his right to file a pro se response. He did not file a response. We have independently reviewed the record to determine whether there are any arguable grounds which support an appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 509-10 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We have found none. It is unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to rebrief Chambers s appeal. See Bledsoe, 178 S.W.3d at 826-27; compare Stafford, 813 S.W.2d at 511. The trial court s judgment is affirmed. AFFIRMED. ________________________________ DAVID GAULTNEY Justice Submitted on October 27, 2011 Opinion Delivered November 9, 2011 Do Not Publish Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
