Angela Lea Dunaway a/k/a Angela Dunaway v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 252nd District Court of Jefferson County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-09-00535-CR ____________________ ANGELA LEA DUNAWAY a/k/a ANGELA DUNAWAY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 252nd District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. 08-04472 MEMORANDUM OPINION Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant Angela Lea Dunaway a/k/a Angela Dunaway1 pled guilty to forgery. The trial court found Dunaway guilty and assessed punishment at two years of confinement in a state jail facility, then suspended imposition of sentence and placed Dunaway on community supervision for five years. The State subsequently filed a motion to revoke Dunaway s community supervision. Dunaway pled true to two violations of the terms of the community supervision order. The trial court 1 Appellant is further identified in the record as Angela Coudrain. 1 found that Dunaway violated the terms of the community supervision order, revoked Dunaway s community supervision, and imposed a sentence of two years of confinement in a state jail facility. Dunaway s appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel s professional evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On March 25, 2010, we granted an extension of time for appellant to file a pro se brief. We received no response from the appellant. We have reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel s conclusion that no arguable issues support an appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court s judgment.2 AFFIRMED. ________________________________ CHARLES KREGER Justice Submitted on August 5, 2010 Opinion Delivered August 18, 2010 Do Not Publish Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger, JJ. 2 Appellant may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
