In Re John Does 1 and 2--Appeal from 172nd District Court of Jefferson County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _________________ NO. 09-10-00189-CV _________________ IN RE JOHN DOES 1 AND 2 ____________________________________________________________________ _ Original Proceeding ___________________________________________________________________ __ MEMORANDUM OPINION Relators John Does 1 and 2 filed a petition for writ of mandamus, in which they contend the trial court abused its discretion by denying their motion to quash the subpoena duces tecum that PRK Enterprises, Inc. and Klein Investments, Inc. served on Google, Inc. Mandamus will issue only to correct a clear abuse of discretion or violation of a duty imposed by law when that abuse cannot be remedied by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839 (Tex. 1992). After reviewing the mandamus record and petition, we conclude that the relators have not demonstrated a clear abuse of discretion by the trial court. Accordingly, we deny relators motion for emergency stay, and we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. 1 PETITION DENIED. PER CURIAM Opinion Delivered April 29, 2010 Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
