Aaron Keith Robertson v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 356th District Court of Hardin County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-09-00402-CR ____________________ AARON KEITH ROBERTSON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee ___________________________________________________________________ __ On Appeal from the 356th District Court Hardin County, Texas Trial Cause No. 19176 ___________________________________________________________________ __ MEMORANDUM OPINION Aaron Keith Robertson appeals the revocation of deferred adjudication community supervision and imposition of a ten year sentence for the third degree felony offense of retaliation. See TEX. PEN. CODE ANN. ยง 36.06(a)(1)(B) (Vernon Supp. 2009).1 Robertson pled true to seven of the allegations contained in the State s motion to adjudicate.2 1 2 The appellant s name also appears in the record spelled Arron Robertson. The State abandoned the remaining allegations. 1 On appeal, Robertson s counsel filed a brief that presents counsel s professional evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On December 17, 2009, we granted an extension of time for the appellant to file a pro se brief. We received no response from appellant. We reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel s conclusion that no arguable issues support an appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); cf. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court s judgment.3 AFFIRMED. ________________________________ DAVID GAULTNEY Justice Submitted on April 7, 2010 Opinion Delivered April 21, 2010 Do Not Publish Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ. 3 Appellant may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
