Georgia Black v. Christus St. Elizabeth Hospital of Beaumont, Texas, Shungman Kirby Lee and Eric Adam Mark--Appeal from 136th District Court of Jefferson County

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-08-108 CV ____________________ GEORGIA BLACK, Appellant V. CHRISTUS ST. ELIZABETH HOSPITAL OF BEAUMONT, TEXAS, SHUNGMAN KIRBY LEE, and ERIC ADAM MARK, Appellees On Appeal from the 136th District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. A-179, 827 MEMORANDUM OPINION The brief of the appellant, Georgia Black, was due on May 14, 2008, but has not been filed. On June 6, 2008, we notified the parties that the appeal would be submitted without briefs unless we received either the brief and a motion for extension of time within ten days. On June 2, 2008, appellee, Shungman Kurt Lee, filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.1 Lee 1 The plaintiff’s petition incorrectly referred to Christus Health Southeast Texas d/b/a Christus Hospital St. Elizabeth as “Christus St. Elizabeth Hospital of Beaumont, Texas,” Shungman Kurt Lee as “Shungman Kirby Lee,” and Eric Mark as “Eric Adam Mark.” 1 contends the appellant filed her notice of appeal three days after the deadline, and in the alternative contends the appeal should be dismissed because the appellant failed to prosecute her appeal. The appellant did not respond to the Lee’s motion or request additional time to file her brief. The appellant filed notice of appeal within fifteen days after the deadline for filing notice of appeal. See T EX. R. A PP. P. 26.3. Although the appellant perfected an appeal within the period of time permitted for an extension, she failed to timely file a brief or to provide a satisfactory explanation for her failure to timely file the brief. Accordingly, we grant appellee Lee’s motion and dismiss the entire appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX. R. A PP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We deny appellee Lee’s request for damages arising from defending a frivolous appeal. See T EX. R. A PP. P. 45. Costs are assessed against the appellant. APPEAL DISMISSED. __________________________________ CHARLES KREGER Justice Opinion Delivered June 26, 2008 Before Gaultney, Kreger, and Horton, JJ. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.