Martin R. Rodriguez v. Joe Jackson, Constance Henson and Paul Eaglin--Appeal from 58th District Court of Jefferson County

In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
____________________
NO. 09-06-046 CV
____________________
MARTIN R. RODRIGUEZ, Appellant
V.
JOE JACKSON, CONSTANCE HENSON AND PAUL EAGLIN, Appellees
On Appeal from the 58th District Court
Jefferson County, Texas
Trial Cause No. A-163381
MEMORANDUM OPINION

On May 18, 2006, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the appellant explained why he needed time for filing the record. Appellant did not respond. The appellant is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Costs are assessed against appellant.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

____________________________

STEVE McKEITHEN

Chief Justice

 

Opinion Delivered July 27, 2006

Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ.