IN RE THE COMMITMENT OF JIMMY WILLETT--Appeal from 359th District Court of Montgomery County

Annotate this Case
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
____________________
NO. 09-05-436 CV
____________________
IN RE COMMITMENT OF JIMMY WILLETT
On Appeal from the 359th District Court
Montgomery County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 04-10-08448 CV
MEMORANDUM OPINION

The State of Texas filed a petition to commit appellant Jimmy Willett as a sexually violent predator. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. 841.001 - .150 (Vernon 2003 & Supp. 2005). A jury found Willett suffers from a behavioral abnormality that makes him likely to engage in a predatory act of sexual violence. The trial court entered a final judgment and order of civil commitment.

In his sole issue, Willett contends the trial court lacked jurisdiction and venue was improper because section 841.041(a) of the Health and Safety Code violates article III, section 56(a)(4), (b) of the Texas Constitution. (1) See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. 841.041(a) (Vernon Supp. 2005); Tex. Const. art. III, 56(a)(4), (b).

After the parties filed their briefs, we considered and rejected the same argument in In re Commitment of Polk, No. 09-05-320 CV, 2006 WL 668218, at *2-*3 (Tex. App. - Beaumont Mar. 16, 2006, no pet. h.). For the same reasons, we reject Willett's argument here. We overrule issue one and affirm the trial court's judgment.

AFFIRMED.

_________________________________

HOLLIS HORTON

Justice

 

Submitted on April 3, 2006

Opinion Delivered April 27, 2006

Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ.

1. The State asserts Willett did not preserve his constitutional challenge because he failed to file a motion to transfer venue until the day after he filed his motion to dismiss. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 86 (A motion to transfer venue must be filed prior to or concurrently with any other plea or it is waived.). However, we find Willett preserved the issue. Willett's motion to dismiss asserted that the trial court lacked jurisdiction and venue was improper because section 841.041 is unconstitutional, and the record reflects the trial court ruled on the motion. See Tex. R. App. P. 33.1(a); Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. 841.041(a).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.