In the Interest of K. E. H., a child Appeal from 454th Judicial District Court of Medina County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-19-00760-CV IN THE INTEREST OF K. E. H., a Child From the 454th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas Trial Court No. 03-10-16641-CV Honorable Kelley Kimble, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice Delivered and Filed: December 27, 2019 DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION Brian Griffin seeks to appeal the trial court’s September 18, 2019 order modifying Griffin’s child support obligation. Griffin’s notice of appeal was due October 18, 2019, thirty days after the order was signed, or a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due fifteen days later. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1, 26.3. Griffin mailed his notice of appeal to the trial court clerk, where it was received and filed stamped October 25, 2019. The envelope containing the notice of appeal bears a postmark date of October 22, 2019. A document filed by mail is timely only if it is deposited in the mail on or before the last day for filing. TEX. R. CIV. P. 5; TEX. R. APP. P. 9.2(b)(1)(C). Griffin did not file a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1 but within the fifteen-day grace 04-19-00760-CV period provided by rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 615 (1997). However, the appellant must offer a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal timely. See id.; TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3, 10.5(b)(1)(C). On November 8, 2019, we ordered Griffin to file a response by December 2, 2019, offering a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal timely. We advised Griffin that a “reasonable explanation” is any plausible statement of circumstances indicating that failure to timely file was not deliberate or intentional, but was the result of inadvertence, mistake or mischance. See Hone v. Hanafin, 104 S.W.3d 884, 886-87 (Tex. 2003). Our order also advised Griffin that if he failed to respond within the time provided, the appeal would be dismissed. Griffin has not filed a response to our November 8, 2019 order. We therefore dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. PER CURIAM -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
