Bryan Sanchez v. The State of Texas Appeal from 379th Judicial District Court of Bexar County (memorandum opinion per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-19-00684-CR Bryan SANCHEZ, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019CR7794 Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios Justice Beth Watkins, Justice Delivered and Filed: November 27, 2019 DISMISSED Appellant, Bryan Sanchez, entered into a plea bargain with the State, and pled nolo contendere to the offense of sexual assault. The trial court imposed sentence in accordance with the agreement and signed a certificate stating this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Sanchez timely filed a notice of appeal. The clerk’s record, which includes the trial court’s rule 25.2(a)(2) certification and a written plea bargain agreement, has been filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). 04-19-00684-CR The clerk’s record establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant and that the trial court denied permission to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record thus supports the trial court’s certification that Sanchez does not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should review clerk’s record to determine whether trial court’s certification is accurate). This court gave Sanchez written notice that the appeal would be dismissed unless an amended trial court certification stating he has the right to appeal were made part of the appellate record by November 15, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.–San Antonio 2003, order) (en banc), disp. on merits, No. 04-03-00176-CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July 2, 2003, pet. ref’d) (not designated for publication). Neither a response nor an amended certification showing Sanchez has the right to appeal has been filed. Having reviewed the clerk’s record, we conclude the trial court’s certification accurately states that this is a plea bargain case and Sanchez does not have a right to appeal. See Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 614-15. This court must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). We therefore dismiss this appeal. PER CURIAM DO NOT PUBLISH -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
