In the Matter of A.S. Appeal from 386th Judicial District Court of Bexar County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-19-00594-CV IN THE MATTER OF A.S. From the 386th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018JUV00095 Honorable Arcelia Trevino, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice Delivered and Filed: October 2, 2019 DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION The clerk’s record in this appeal shows that the juvenile court waived its exclusive original jurisdiction and transferred appellant’s case to a criminal district court. The trial court signed the order on June 15, 2019. An order waiving a juvenile court’s jurisdiction and transferring the underlying cause to criminal district court is an appealable order. TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 56.01(c)(1)(A); see In re T. S., 548 S.W.3d 711, 720 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2018, no pet.). The appeal is accelerated and “has precedence over all other cases.” TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 56.01(h). Accordingly, appellant’s notice of appeal was due to be filed on July 5, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(b). A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due to be filed no later than July 22, 2019. See id. R. 26.3. 04-19-00594-CV Because appellant’s notice of appeal, which was filed on September 3, 2019, appeared to be untimely, we ordered appellant to show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a); Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (“[O]nce the period for granting a motion for extension of time under Rule [26.3] has passed, a party can no longer invoke the appellate court’s jurisdiction.”). Appellant’s attorney responded that she was not appointed to represent the appellant until September 3, 2019. Although appellant’s attorney acknowledges the notice of appeal was untimely filed, she requests that we retain the appeal on our docket. Because this court has no jurisdiction over untimely filed appeals, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. PER CURIAM -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.