In the Interest of C.M.M, a child Appeal from 224th Judicial District Court of Bexar County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-14-00733-CV In the Interest of C.M.M., a Child From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014-CI-11929 Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Delivered and Filed: December 3, 2014 DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION When Carlos Gabriel Morales filed this appeal, he was required to pay a $195.00 filing fee. See TEXAS SUPREME COURT ORDER REGARDING FEES CHARGED IN CIVIL CASES IN THE SUPREME COURT AND THE COURTS OF APPEALS AND BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION (Misc. Docket No. 13-9127, Aug. 16, 2013). Morales did not pay the required filing fee; accordingly, the clerk of this court notified him by letter that his notice of appeal was conditionally filed and the filing fee was due. On November 6, 2014, when the fee remained unpaid, this court ordered that Morales must, not later than November 17, 2014, either (1) pay the applicable filing fee or (2) provide written proof to this court that he is indigent or otherwise excused by statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying the fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (“A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must pay—at 04-14-00733-CV the time an item is presented for filing—whatever fees are required by statute or Supreme Court order. The appellate court may enforce this rule by any order that is just.”). The court advised Morales that if he failed to respond satisfactorily within the time ordered, the appeal would be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. The filing fee has not been paid, and Morales has not otherwise responded to our order. We therefore dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. PER CURIAM -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.