In the Interest of A.G., A Child Appeal from 285th Judicial District Court of Bexar County (memorandum opinion )
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-14-00470-CV IN THE INTEREST OF A.G., a Child From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013-PA-01929 Honorable Fred Shannon, Judge Presiding Opinion by: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Delivered and Filed: November 12, 2014 MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; AFFIRMED Angelica G. 1 appeals the trial court’s order terminating her parent-child relationship with A.G. Appellant’s court-appointed appellate attorney filed a motion to withdraw and a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record, demonstrating there are no arguable grounds to be advanced, and concluding the appeal is frivolous. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). See In re R.R., No. 04-03-00096-CV, 2003 WL 21157944, *4 (Tex. App.—San Antonio May 21, 2003, order) (applying Anders procedure to appeals from orders terminating parental rights), disp. on merits, 2003 WL 22080522 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Sept. 10, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.). Appellant was provided copies of the brief and the motion to 1 To protect the identity of the minor child, we refer to the mother by her first name and to the child by initials. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 109.002(d) (West 2014); TEX. R. APP. P. 9.8. 04-14-00470-CV withdraw and was informed of her right to review the record and file her own brief. In addition, counsel advised appellant to immediately file a motion in this court if she wished to review the appellate record and enclosed a form motion for that purpose. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (2014); In re R.R., 2003 WL 21157944, at *4. Appellant did not request access to the record. The court then set a deadline for appellant to file a pro se brief. Appellant did not file a pro se brief. We have reviewed the record and the attorney’s Anders brief and we agree with counsel that the appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we grant the motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s order. Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
