Joe Anthony Loredo v. The State of Texas--Appeal from County Court at Law No. 5 of Bexar County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-09-00819-CR Joe Anthony LOREDO, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the County Court at Law No. 5, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 227041 Honorable Pat Priest, Judge Presiding Opinion by: Rebecca Simmons, Justice Sitting: Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Delivered and Filed: November 24, 2010 AFFIRMED A jury found Joe Anthony Loredo guilty of driving while intoxicated, and the trial court suspended Loredo s sentence and placed him on community supervision. Loredo s court- appointed attorney filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel concludes that the appeal has no merit. Counsel provided Loredo with a copy of the brief and informed him of his right to review the record and file his own brief. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App. San 04-09-00819-CR Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App. San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Loredo did not file a pro se brief. After reviewing the record and counsel s brief, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Appellate counsel s motion to withdraw is granted. Nichols, 954 S.W.2d at 86; Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Loredo wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Loredo must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or Loredo must file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the date of either this opinion or the last timely motion for rehearing that is overruled by this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed with this court, after which it will be forwarded to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.3, 68.7. Any petition for discretionary review should comply with the requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.4. Rebecca Simmons, Justice DO NOT PUBLISH -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
