In the Interest of K.N.S. and R.R.S., Jr., Minor Children--Appeal from 407th Judicial District Court of Bexar County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
i i i i i i MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-10-00241-CV IN THE INTEREST OF K.N.S. & R.R.S. Jr., Minor Children, From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009-PA-00651 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Associate Judge Presiding1 Opinion by: Marialyn Barnard, Justice Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Delivered and Filed: July 21, 2010 MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; AFFIRMED Erica Jean Torres appeals the trial court s judgment terminating her parental rights, and its order finding her appellate points frivolous. See TEX . FAM . CODE ANN . § 263.405( d)(3) (Vernon Supp. 2009). Appellant s court-appointed appellate attorney has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating there are no arguable grounds to be advanced and concluding the appeal is frivolous. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). See In re R.R., No. 04-03-00096-CV, 2003 WL 21157944, *4 (Tex. App. San Antonio May 21, 2003, order) (applying Anders procedure to appeals from orders ¦ The Honorable Karen H. Pozza is the presiding judge of the 407th District Court. The order of termination was signed by the Honorable Charles Montemayor, Associate Judge. 1 04-10-00241-CV terminating parental rights), disp. on merits, 2003 WL 22080522 (Tex. App. San Antonio Sept. 10, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.). Appellant was provided a copy of the brief and informed of her right to file her own brief. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App. San Antonio, July 23, 1997, no pet.); In re R.R., 2003 WL 21157944, at *4. Appellant filed a one-half page letter brief in which she very generally contests the termination. We have reviewed the record, the attorney s brief, and appellant s pro se brief, and we agree with counsel that the appellate points do not present a substantial question for appellate review. See TEX . CIV . PRAC. & REM . CODE ANN . §13.003(b) (Vernon 2002); TEX . FAM . CODE ANN . § 263.405(d)(3) (incorporating section 13.003(b) by reference). Accordingly, we hold the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding the points of appeal to be frivolous. We grant the motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court s judgment. Marialyn Barnard, Justice -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
