In re Shawn Bean, Relator--Appeal from 290th Judicial District Court of Bexar County

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
i i i i i i MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-10-00476-CR IN RE Shawn BEAN Original Mandamus Proceeding1 PER CURIAM Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Delivered and Filed: July 14, 2010 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION On June 25, 2010, relator Shawn Bean filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining about the trial court s failure to provide him with a copy of the trial court transcript in his underlying felony conviction so that he can prepare his post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus. In 2009, relator was convicted of possession of a controlled substance, less than one gram, and was sentenced to five and a half years confinement. On March 3, 2010, this court affirmed the conviction. Only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction over matters related to postconviction relief from an otherwise final felony conviction. See Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 1 ¦ This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2008-CR-2614, styled State of Texas v. Shawn Bean, in the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Sharon MacRae presiding. 04-10-00476-CR S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. 1991); see also TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. ANN . art. 11.07 (Vernon Supp. 2008); Board of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (holding that Article 11.07 provides the exclusive means to challenge a final felony conviction. ). Because the relief sought in relator s petition relates to postconviction relief from an otherwise final felony conviction, we are without jurisdiction to consider his petition for writ of mandamus. Accordingly, relator s petition is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. PER CURIAM DO NOT PUBLISH -2-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.