In re Jason Miears--Appeal from 379th Judicial District Court of Bexar County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
i i i i i i MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-09-00728-CR IN RE Jason MIEARS Original Mandamus Proceeding1 PER CURIAM Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Delivered and Filed: November 25, 2009 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED On November 13, 2009, relator Jason Miears filed three petitions for writ of mandamus complaining of the trial court s failure to arraign him.2 Under Safety-Kleen Corp., mandamus will not issue unless the record shows that a motion has been properly filed and the trial court has failed to rule on it in a reasonable amount of time. See Safety-Kleen v. Garcia, 945 S.W.2d 268, 269 (Tex. App. San Antonio 1997, orig. proceeding). Any motion relating to relator s complaint that he has not been arraigned would have to be filed by 1 ¦ This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2009-CR-6566, styled State v. Jason Miears, pending in the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Ron Rangel presiding. 2 ¦ O ne petition is entitled W rit of Habeas Corpus and one petition is entitled Petition for Writ of Quo W arranto; however, we construe them as mandamus petitions because they also complain of the trial court s failure to arraign relator. 04-09-00728-CR relator s appointed counsel since he is not entitled to hybrid representation in the criminal proceeding in the trial court. See Dunn v. State, 819 S.W.2d 510, 525 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); see also Robinson v. State, 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007); Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). Consequently, we do not find any abuse of discretion by the trial court. Additionally, relator requests that this court order the sheriff to transport him to a psychiatric hospital. However, we have no mandamus jurisdiction over a sheriff unless the issuance of the writ is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 692 (Tex. App. San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding); see also TEX . GOV T CODE ANN . § 22.221(a)-(b) (Vernon 2004). We conclude relator s request is not necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. Therefore, we conclude that relator has not shown himself entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition is DENIED. TEX . R. APP . P. 52.8(a). PER CURIAM DO NOT PUBLISH -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
