Justin Michael Bond v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 187th Judicial District Court of Bexar County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
i i i i i i MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-08-00838-CR Justin Michael BOND, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2005CR2773 Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding Opinion by: Marialyn Barnard, Justice Sitting: Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Delivered and Filed: July 1, 2009 AFFIRMED Justin Michael Bond pled true to violating the conditions of his deferred adjudication community supervision. His guilt was adjudicated, and he was sentenced to six years imprisonment. Bond s court-appointed attorney filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel concludes that the appeal has no merit. Counsel provided Bond with a copy of the brief and informed him of his right to review 04-08-00838-CR the record and file his own brief. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App. San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App. San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Bond did not file a pro se brief. After reviewing the record and counsel s brief, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit.1 The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Appellate counsel s motion to withdraw is granted. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d at 86; Bruns 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Bond wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Bond must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or Bond must file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the date of either this opinion or the last timely motion for rehearing that is overruled by this court. See TEX . R. APP . P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed with this court, after which it will be forwarded to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See TEX . R. APP . P. 68.3, 68.7. Any petition for discretionary review should comply with the requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX . R. APP . P. 68.4 Marialyn Barnard, Justice DO NOT PUBLISH 1 ¦ W e note that the trial court filed an amended Trial Court s Certification of Defendant s Right of Appeal in this court on November 19, 2008, certifying that the underlying case is an adjudication of guilt following a deferred adjudication, and the defendant has a limited right of appeal. -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
