B. Jack Talton d/b/a Architectural Innovations v. Houston Foam Plastics, Inc.--Appeal from 73rd Judicial District Court of Bexar County
Annotate this CaseMEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-08-00159-CV
B. Jack TALTON, d/b/a Architectural Innovations,
Appellant
v.
HOUSTON FOAM PLASTICS, INC.,
Appellees
From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2007-CI-07119
Honorable Lori Massey, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice
Rebecca Simmons, Justice
Delivered and Filed: May 28, 2008
DISMISSED
A filing fee of $125.00 was due from appellant B. Jack Talton when this appeal was filed but was not paid. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. 51.207(b)(1), 51.941(a)(1) (Vernon 2005); Texas Supreme Court Order Regarding Fees Charged In Civil Cases In the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals (July 21, 1998) B.1.(a). The clerk of the court notified appellant of this deficiency in a letter dated March 6, 2008. The fee remains unpaid. Rule 5 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides:
A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must pay - at the time an item is presented for filing - whatever fees are required by statute or Supreme Court order. The appellate court may enforce this rule by any order that is just.
Tex. R. App. P. 5.
Accordingly, on May 2, 2008, this court ordered appellant to either (1) pay the applicable filing fee or (2) provide written proof to this court that he is excused by statute or the Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying the fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (providing that indigent party who complies with provisions of that rule may proceed without advance payment of costs). Our order informed appellant that if he failed to respond satisfactorily within the time ordered, this appeal would be dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. No response has been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. Costs of appeal are taxed against appellant.
PER CURIAM
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.