In re Rodolfo Ruiz--Appeal from 226th Judicial District Court of Bexar County

Annotate this Case
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-07-00796-CV
IN RE Rodolfo RUIZ
Original Mandamus Proceeding (1)

PER CURIAM

 

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

 

Delivered and Filed: November 28, 2007

 

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

Relator Rodolfo Ruiz has filed a pro se mandamus petition arguing the trial court has a ministerial duty to rule on pro se pre-trial motions in his pending criminal cases. Ruiz is represented by trial counsel below. A trial court's decision to rule on pro se motions filed by a represented criminal defendant is discretionary, not ministerial. Scarbrough v. State, 777 S.W.2d 83, 92 (Tex. Crim. App. 1989); McKinny v. State, 76 S.W.3d 463, 478 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, no pet.); Meyer v. State, 27 S.W.3d 644, 648 (Tex. App.--Waco 2000, pet. ref'd). Accordingly, Ruiz's mandamus petition is denied.

PER CURIAM

1. This proceeding arises out of Cause Nos. 2006-CR-8842 and 2006-CR-8843A, styled State of Texas v. Rodolfo Ruiz, pending in the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Sid L. Harle presiding.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.