Robert L. Gibson v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 186th Judicial District Court of Bexar County
Annotate this CaseMEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-07-00336-CR
Robert L. GIBSON,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2006-CR-7936
Honorable Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice
Rebecca Simmons, Justice
Delivered and Filed: July 11, 2007
DISMISSED
Defendant Robert Gibson pled nolo contendere to possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver, and was sentenced within the terms of a plea bargain. Defendant timely filed a notice of appeal in which he alleges the trial court granted him permission to appeal. The trial court's Certification of Defendant's Right of Appeal states this "is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal." See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk's record contains a written plea bargain and a written waiver of appeal, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by defendant.
"In a plea bargain case ... a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court's permission to appeal." Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk's record does not contain a written motion ruled on before trial nor does it indicate the trial court granted defendant permission to appeal. This court must dismiss an appeal "if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made a part of the record." Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). Accordingly, on May 25, 2007, this court issued an order stating this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification that shows appellant has the right of appeal was made part of the appellate record. See Daniels v. State,110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 2003, order); Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); 37.1. No amended trial court certification has been filed; therefore, this appeal is dismissed.
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.