Goodyear Dunlop Tires North America, Ltd. v. Maria De Los Angeles Ortiz Gamez, et al.--Appeal from 111th Judicial District Court of Webb County

Annotate this Case
CONCURRING OPINION
No. 04-02-00932-CV
GOODYEAR DUNLOP TIRES NORTH AMERICA, LTD.,
Appellant
v.
Maria De Los Angeles Ortiz GAMEZ, et al.,
Appellees
From the 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2001-CVE-000862-D2
Honorable Raul Vasquez, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Concurring opinion by: Sarah B. Duncan, Justice

Sitting: Sarah B. Duncan, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 25, 2004

I concur in the court's judgment but write separately because I feel compelled to express my shock and outrage at the billing practices exhibited in this case by these ad litems - all of whom are members of the State Bar of Texas and thus subject to the Rule of Professional Conduct 1.04(a), which unequivocally prohibits a lawyer from "charg[ing] ... an unconscionable fee." Tex. Disciplinary R. Prof'l Conduct 1.04(a), reprinted in Tex. Gov't Code Ann., tit. 2, subtit. G, app. A (Vernon 1998). How could any lawyer defend billing for more than twenty-four hours in a day ... two to four hours to review a standard one-page deposition notice ... or five hours for sleeping? Billing practices such as these not only demonstrate why the legal profession in general - and ad litems in particular - are under siege but also, I believe, forcefully support my request to the full court to report these attorneys to the grievance committee.

Sarah B. Duncan, Justice

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.