Victor Salazar v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 187th Judicial District Court of Bexar County

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-03-00723-CR

No. 04-03-00724-CR

No. 04-03-00725-CR

Victor SALAZAR,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 2002-CR-7138-B, 2002-CR-7139-B, 2003-CR-0101

Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Sitting: Paul W. Green, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 5, 2004

AFFIRMED

A jury found defendant, Victor Salazar, guilty of aggravated kidnaping, aggravated robbery, and burglary of a habitation, and assessed punishment at confinement of thirty-nine years, thirty years, and twenty years respectively.

Defendant's court-appointed appellate attorney filed a brief containing one arguable issue, which we interpret as a challenge to the factual sufficiency of the evidence, but concluding that this appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

Counsel's brief meets the requirements of Anders and he has provided appellant with a copy of the brief and advised her of her right to review the record and file a pro se brief. Appellant has not done so. Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1996, no pet.).

We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. The evidence is factually sufficient to support the jury's verdict, and we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgments of the trial court are affirmed. Furthermore, we grant the motions to withdraw. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns 924 S.W.2d at 177, n.1.

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

DO NOT PUBLISH