Ramon Garcia, P. C. v. Caddell & Chapman, P.C.; Michael A. Caddell, Individually; Law Offices of Ezequiel Reyna, Jr., L.L.P.; and Ezequiel Reyna, Jr., Individually; Law Offices of Alberto A. Munoz, II, P.C.; and Alberto A. Munoz, II, Individually--Appeal from 365th Judicial District Court of Maverick County

No. 04-01-00208-CV
RAMON GARCIA, P.C.,
Appellant
v.
CADDELL & CHAPMAN, P.C., et al.,
Appellees
From the 365th Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas
Trial Court No. 97-07-14605-CV
Honorable Amado J. Abascal, III, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Phil Hardberger, Chief Justice

Tom Rickhoff, Justice

Alma L. L pez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 5, 2001

DISMISSED

The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal, stating that they have fully compromised and settled all issues in dispute. The motion is granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Because the cause is moot, all previous orders and judgments, both trial and appellate, are set aside and the cause is dismissed. See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Hughes, 827 S.W.2d 859, 859 (Tex. 1992); Exxon Corp. v. Butler, 619 S.W.2d 399, 399 (Tex. 1981); Freeman v. Burrows, 141 Tex. 318, 171 S.W.2d 863, 863-64 (1943); Panterra v. American Dairy Queen, 908 S.W.2d 300, 301 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1995, no writ). Costs of appeal are taxed against the parties who incurred them.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH