Rogelio A. Gonzalez v. Texas Parks & Wildlife Department--Appeal from 381st Judicial District Court of Starr County

No. 04-97-00423-CV
Rogelio A. GONZALEZ,
Appellant
v.
TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT,
Appellee
From the 381st Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas
Trial Court No. 9475
Honorable John A. Pope, III, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Sarah B. Duncan, Justice

Sitting: Phil Hardberger, Chief Justice

Tom Rickhoff, Justice

Sarah B. Duncan, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 30, 1998

REVERSED AND REMANDED

Rogelio A. Gonzalez appeals the trial court's dismissal of his case for want of jurisdiction on the ground that state-agency immunity has been waived for purposes of anti-retaliation claims. We agree and therefore reverse the judgment and remand the case for proceedings on the merits.

Factual and Procedural Background

When dealing with a plea to the jurisdiction, "we take the factual allegations in the plaintiff's petition as true." Fernandez v. Kerrville State Hospital, No. 04-97-00387-CV, slip op. at 2, 1998 WL 784326 (Tex. App.--San Antonio Nov. 12, 1998, no pet. h.) (citing Brannon v. Pacific Employers Ins. Co., 148 Tex. 289, 224 S.W.2d 466, 469 (1949)). "Therefore, for purposes of this appeal, the material facts are undisputed." Id.

Gonzalez attempted to bring a workers' compensation claim for injuries suffered while working for TPWD, but was discouraged from doing so by his supervisor. When Gonzalez later made a second request to file a workers' compensation claim, he was effectively prevented from doing so by his supervisor who had already reported the incident non-job related. After the incident, Gonzalez was placed on a year's leave without pay. When he returned, he was not allowed to do the light-duty work his doctor recommended and he received pressure to take early retirement. Gonzalez sued, claiming TPWD terminated him and otherwise discriminated against him because of his pursuit of a workers' compensation claim. Subsequently, TPWD moved to dismiss Gonzalez' suit based on sovereign immunity. The trial court agreed and dismissed the suit for want of jurisdiction.

Discussion

TPWD is immune from suit unless the Texas Legislature has waived immunity. Fernandez, 04-97-00387, slip op. at 3. Here, the trial court ruled TPWD was immune from a suit brought under the Anti-Retaliation Law. See Tex. Lab. Code Ann. 451.001 (Vernon 1996). However, as this court recently held in Fernandez, "the Texas Legislature left 'no reasonable doubt' that it intended to waive immunity from suit under the Anti-Retaliation Law for state agencies covered by chapter 501 of the Texas Labor Code." Fernandez, 04-97-00387, slip op. at 13; see Tex. Lab. Code Ann. ch. 501. Because TPWD is an agency under chapter 501 of the Texas Labor Code, see Tex. Lab. Code Ann. 501.001(6); see, e.g., Director, State Employees Workers ' Compensation Div. v. Bass, 703 S.W.2d 397 (Tex. App.--Beaumont 1986, no writ), it is not immune from suit under the Anti-Retaliation Law.

We therefore reverse the trial court's judgment and remand the case for proceedings on the merits.

Sarah B. Duncan, Justice

PUBLISH

Return to
4th Court of Appeals Opinions